Thread
:
Photo Aviatik D.I
View Single Post
#
5
1st December 2021, 18:11
Stig Jarlevik
Alter Hase
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,183
Re: Photo Aviatik D.I
Looks like it Clint
the digits 51 seems solid enough.
The other possibilities of the prefix (to me) such as 58 (not valid), 53.51 (Albatros) and 33.51 (B.III) seems very unlikely.
Cheers
Stig
Stig Jarlevik
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Stig Jarlevik
Find all posts by Stig Jarlevik