|
Re: Question regarding a victory for Heinz Bär 07/08/44
Guys,my question is not whether or not was a fraudster,but in this case (well documented),how was the OKL able to approve his request.
In his request,Bär is "honest":he saw nothing and has no witnesses!it's hard to do better,and yet,the OKL approved his request in total contradiction of the directive 55 270/41.
Same mystery for his claim 04/22/44 with witness and not approved!
Who is the "dishonest":Bär or the OKL?
michel
|