Quote:
Originally Posted by tcolvin
'Helpful' in what way, Nick?
What would be the purpose of making these distinctions?
Are you suggesting different uses had different origins?
Or am I missing something in your comment?
Tony
|
1. Helpful because your original question was speculating as to motive, not means.
2. See above. In attempting to analyse policy, the fighter bomber
per se is not the point, the point is what you the owner tries to achieve with it.
3. Quite obviously the numerous uses of the fighter bomber had their respective origins in different sets of circumstance and the pursuit of a variety of objectives.
4. Conceivably.
5. Why don't you try National Archives file KV4/66, "Formation and minutes of the Twenty Committee in connection with Double Cross agents: 1943 Feb 25-1943 Oct 21"?