![]() |
|
|||||||
| Off Topic Please use this forum to discuss all off topic subjects. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Unknown bomber-unknown war
Hi all,
Found this photo at a flea market and my arabic is not that good... perhaps a Forum member can translate...? And what kind of Bomber do we have here? I guess it's a post-2WW photo, 1948 Arab-Israeli War? Thanks for your input! Hans |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Unknown bomber-unknown war
Perhaps more "readable" this way...
Hans |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Unknown bomber-unknown war
Too small image but look like Wellington.
__________________
Srecko Bradic Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum Owner: www.sreckobradic.com Owner: www.warplanes-zine.com Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com Skype: sreckobradic Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLet...s/308234397758 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Unknown bomber-unknown war
Definitely Wellington, the bombs are early war British, the scenery looks fairly English too, what can be seen of it.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Unknown bomber-unknown war
Thanks for your replies! Now, why an arabic text and what does it mean? Probably nothing exciting, but still...
Hans |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Unknown bomber-unknown war
Yes, it is typical Wellington shape.
__________________
http://cz-raf.webnode.cz |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Unknown bomber-unknown war
My guess is that it is a Wellington based in England early WWII.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Friendly fire WWII | Brian | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 803 | 8th July 2023 16:47 |
| Lost Ju 52s in January, 1945 | HGabor | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 11th March 2013 17:34 |
| Ju188 lost in France | Eric Larger | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 16 | 16th December 2011 00:47 |
| VVS divisions | Mike35nj | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 7th August 2006 14:27 |
| Losses of B-17's in RCM role | paul peters | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 4 | 15th February 2006 21:57 |