Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old 7th May 2011, 01:04
tcolvin tcolvin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Topsham, England
Posts: 422
tcolvin is on a distinguished road
Re: Response to Glider and Juha.

Juha's questions;
Tony,
On Il-2 vs Typhoon. Typhoon was vulnerable to rifle calibre fire but much less vulnerable to Bf 109s and Fw 190s. Both were vulnerable to 20mm AAA. Il-2 was interesting solution to CAS problem but if you look the Soviet losses in men and material in 44-45 and compared those to losses of Western Allies in ETO in 44-45 you can see that it wasn’t a magic weapon. One could not fight a cheap war against an army like WM.On Hillman. I cannot follow your logic. If British had known how difficult object it was they could have softened it by heavy naval fire, for ex from HMS Rodney. 1 Suffolks had had easy job to reduce Morris shortly before (white flag went up before 1 Suffolk even had begun their attack on it). and it dawned to them that Hillman would be a totally different game only after their point platoon and parts of the second were inside Hillman. A bit late if one was not totally callous to the life of his own troops to deploy heavy support fire, dive bombers, BB main armament fire etc at that point.

Juha



1. On the Il-2, I would quote Walter Schwabedissen whose conclusions appear to differ from yours. I look forward in your comments;
"All German commanders describe the IL-2 as a highly useful airplane for ground-attack missions. Owing to its good armour plating, the plane could only be brought down by very well directed ground fire. It had a speed of 210 mph. General der Flakartillerie a.D Wolfgang Pickert adds that the IL-2 was impervious to light 20-mm armour-piercing or 37-mm shells. The same views are expressed by General der Infanterie von der Groben, who emphasises the nose armour and remarks that direct hits with 20-mm shells frequently had no effects on the plane. The experience of the 54th Fighter Wing also shows it was hardly possible to shoot down the IL-2 aircraft in an attack from the rear, because of its excellent armour protection." Source: Walter Schwabedissen: The Russian Air Force in the Eyes of German Commanders.


2. On Hillman, IIRC there was an attack from the air planned which was delayed and ineffective. I seem to remember it was from Heavies. I will have to check and get back to you. I can't answer about naval support.


Tony
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net