Me262 O'Connell book

[RT]

Going thru this book, nd quoting as high as possible his quality, I noted that some conflicts remained nd found that there is still many "???", has Dan. O'Connell made any complements , has he plan to make some ??

regards

Rémi

[Dan O'Connell]

Dear Remi,

Thank you for your kind words. I agree there are still many unanswered questions about the Me 262.
I have not been informed of any possibility of a re-print, but as I find new information, I add it to the original manuscript, on the possibility that they may want to print a revised edition in the future. I hope that happens, as I continue to find new information.

Is there a specific question that you have?

Very best wishes, Dan

[Peter D Evans]

As an aside Dan, has much new info surfaced since publication?

Cheers

Peter D Evans
LEMB Administrator

[Dan O'Connell]

Hi Peter, WNr are now up to 1,224 :-) Probably 5 pages more material; a new sentence here, a new one there. It adds up!

[PhilippeDM]

Dan,

Could you perhaps consider to publish these as an erratum on this website or Peter one? The investment of a second edition can of course be justified, but...

It would be great!

[RT]

Not bad as an idea...

Some losses hv amazed me, the ones occured on february at Giebelstadt
120539+120549+.. the docs say Bü181c-3 for them, seems the Wn valid for this type, hv you found any doc that state , these are in fact Me262 ???

Remi