Why did 10./JG 2 bomb a school in Catford?

[John Vasco]

Originally Posted by tcolvin

The problem arises, however, when the fighter carrying the bombs becomes uncompetitive and should be laid up in a museum or scrapped.
The Jagd part of the Jabo designation had a sell-by date.
So I would suggest your definition be changed to all fighters that can hold their own against enemy fighters, and that carry bombs, were fighter-bombers.

Tony

Once again, that word you love so well: BOLLOCKS!

Read again what you have actually written. It's a load of crap. Nothing less.

A fighter-bomber is a fighter-bomber, is a fighter-bomber. Period. Holding their own against enemy fighters doesn't come into it.

So by your reasoning/logic, the Bf 110s of Erprobungsgruppe 210 couldn't hold their own against Spitifres of the same period, so weren't fighter-bombers.

I do think you are digging an even bigger hole for yourself. Why don't you quit now while you're behind, and not totally out of sight? Please stop writing shite!