![]() |
|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What were the weight savings from removing FW 190 outer wing cannons?
hello
The outer wing guns Affair You have all seen pictures of FW 190 of all series with and without outer wing guns. The amount of ammunition for the MG FF varies from one publication to another and the type of guns changed from version to versions. The guns used in the outer wing inboard position were the MG FFM, MG151/20E and MK108. In this paragraph we will just concerned ourselves with what determined the presence of the gun in the outer position. You will find the ballistic and the effect of the weapons on the plane in the Weapon chapter. According the version of the A there was two types of gun used the MG FFM and the MG 151/20E. As far as the MG FFM is concerned, the part number in the production sheet never changed, save for the A1 and the Aa-3. The MG FFM had slightly better performance than the MG FF and had the ability to fire Mine (highly capacity explosive) ammunition. See the gun section for more details. As far as the A2, A3, A4, A5 are concerned, this was a rustsatz (optional) and it is described as such in production sheets (except for the A1 and the Aa-3 sold to the Turks where it is part of the plane). The manual for the A1, A2, A3, A4 gives the weight for a version with and without the outer guns. The magazine usually used is the T 60-FF with 60 rounds. The manual for the A5 gives one the version with the outer guns and the drum with 90 rounds but precise that removing those guns will save around 1345 kg (98 for the weapons and 37 for the ammo), so it seems clear that this was still an option. The manual for the A1-to A4 and the manual for A5 /A6 clearly states that the T 60-FF (60 rounds) could be replaced with T 90-FF (90 rounds) without any modification. Note: the A6 used MG 151/20E in the outer position but the A5 still used the MG FFM. Of course there is plenty of evidence where the guns were installed. The MG 151/20E in the outer wing position is mandatory equipment, according the plane’s production sheet anyway and the manuals do not mention any removal or rustsatz. That being said there is plenty of photo evidence where even the outer MG151/20 was removed. In September 44, the Uk captured, a deserting ferry pilot crash-landed in England, an A8 with the TU engine. The plane was without the outer MG 151/20E. (PR0 AIR 40/151). The weight for the outer guns 177 kg (112.6 and 64 kg for the ammo) So far I have not being able to determine a set of rule that led to the deletion of the outer guns. These comments only concern fighter planes, Jabo (ground attack) ans Jaborei (long-range ground attack) did not have the external guns installed at all. So here the list of the case where it did happened, just bear in mind that this is just a very generic rule of thumbs. Pilot wish, Installation of the FuG 16 ZY or more precisely the Y or E add-on to the FuG 16 Z, main mission to fight against fighter or to assume a pure fighter role, possibly some gun shortage or re-use of ground attack plane wings in fighter production line. Last edited by philippe willaume; 4th August 2005 at 15:29. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NEW BOOK - Fw 190 D Camouflage & Markings - Pt. 1 | David E. Brown | Focke-Wulf Fw 190D Camouflage & Markings | 71 | 30th March 2014 23:16 |
Hungarian Fw 190 ? (E-Bay photo) | Kari Lumppio | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 26th April 2005 21:40 |
Low altitude tests: P-47 vs. Fw 190 | Six Nifty .50s | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 20th April 2005 00:13 |
The remarkable William Tex Ash, 24 March '42 | Brendan | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 4th February 2005 18:55 |
anyone have the Rechlin 190A4 test chart? | ring | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 9th January 2005 03:46 |