Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old 6th June 2011, 15:08
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 169
Kurfürst
Re: Response to Glider and Juha.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Beale View Post
I suggest you take a look at the experiences of the Ju 87s sent against the Remagen bridge in daylight. They missed and they lost many aircraft to Flak.
Without doubt these attacks were unsuccessful, but I think the point is rather how what weapons system/doctrine is better suited for such task in general (rather than in single cases). A lone 109E Jabo finished off a cruiser for example at Crete in 1941, but it was a lucky hit, and would make a very exceptional case for Jabo effectiveness. They had their place of course, and planes dropping bombs were certainly better than planes dropping no bombs.

Quote:
BTW there's talk in this thread of a Ju 87 with an 1800 kg bomb — can you imagine how slowly that would fly? Sonderverband Einhorn tried the same load on Fw 190 F-8s but rapidly gave up in favour of 1000 kg weapons.
The SC 1800 was one of most widely used bombs on the Eastern Front. I have a table somewhere about the number of bombs dropped, and the SC 1800 was indeed dropped in insane numbers (not only by Stukas, as 111s, 88 etc. were also well capable of carrying them). As for the speed loss, it was a big bomb for sure, but I am not sure OTOH if it had any more serious effect on speed than the other common load of three 1x500 + 2x250 kg(or2x500kg) bombs. As for the 190F, the SC 1800 was possible, but honestly a quite a bit of an (impressive) overload for such a small fighter, not only due to weight but also because of limited ground clearance with such an enormous bomb, whereas the Stuka was much bigger and could handle it well.

Secondly the Stuka was slow in cruise, no matter what it carried, generally trotting around at 250 km/h or so. The bombing runs from steep or later in the war, more gentle dives were made at high speed though.
__________________
Kurfürst! - The Messerschmitt Bf 109 Performance Resource Site
http://www.kurfurst.org/
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2026, 12oclockhigh.net