Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 3rd July 2011, 23:35
Adam's Avatar
Adam Adam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 601
Adam
Re: Oblt Kayser, 1./406 and an incident on 26.7.40

Thanks for the quick response:

@ Martin: The report I have is from the KTB of KFlGr Stavanger and is written by a "Kayser" (I assume to be the StaKa given it is more in depth and is the first report attached to the KTB). He notes the aircraft code specifically as "CH" (K6 is my assumption) and in the report notes the disadvantageous position of the German crew in relation to the Sunderland during the combat precisely because of the Do 18s inferiority in the climbing turn. In fact Kayser infers the only way they escaped was due to the fact the Sunderland disengaged after receiving gun fire to the nose. He also notes that the cannon had jammed (faulty ammunition) and this was the second time such an incident had occured (the first during an operation on 21 June 1940). The damage was inflicted from a range of 50m and whilst the Sunderland was turning to make a beam attack on the a/c.


@ Chris: As Robert states, it was early morning. The report states time as being 07:40 in "grid 2343" in an area of closed cloud between 800 - 1000 metres. Combat took place at an altitude of c.2-300 metres.

Any ideas on 'Horst' Kayser's tenure with the unit? Perhaps Doug can help with this one.


@ Robert: Thanks for the info on the wounded crew member.

Adam
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th July 2011, 01:18
Martin Gleeson Martin Gleeson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Limerick, Ireland.
Posts: 718
Martin Gleeson is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Oblt Kayser, 1./406 and an incident on 26.7.40

Hallo Adam,

Very interesting. Clearly if Stavanger was involved it must have been 204 Squadron which was then based at Sullom Voe in the Shetlands. There are striking similarities between the two incidents; the 10 Sqn. RAAF Sunderland disengaged after it received damage to its front turret and had a crew member wounded, the time (British) of the engagement was 0710 hours and the height varied from 1,000 feet down to 50 feet during the action.

I wonder if N9021 was the identity of 'G'/204 ? It is the only match I can find in 'THE SHORT SUNDERLAND' by Chaz Bowyer for that period of the war, and there seems to be no 'KC-N' as far as I can see.

From Michael Holm's Luftwaffe website I see 1./406 was only operating the Do 18 on that day from Rantum in NW Germany, but was transferred to Stavanger in Norway the following day.

Regards,

Martin.

Last edited by Martin Gleeson; 4th July 2011 at 02:02. Reason: Errors in text
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th July 2011, 03:27
Larry deZeng Larry deZeng is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,632
Larry deZeng has a spectacular aura aboutLarry deZeng has a spectacular aura about
Re: Oblt Kayser, 1./406 and an incident on 26.7.40

Of 6 KAYSERs in our data base, this is the only one who seems to meet or come close to the specifications:

KAYSER, Horst. (DOB: 01.05.14). 16.10.39 Oblt., trf from 2./Kü.Fl.Gr. 406 to Führerreserve RLM/Ob.d.L. c. 02.40 Oblt., Staka 1./Kü.Fl.Gr. 406 (to 00.40). 04.40 Hptm., Staka 1./Kü.Fl.Gr. 906. 01.07.42 promo to Maj. 11.42 Maj., appt Kdr. III./KG 26 (to 19.12.42). 19.12.42 MIA – failed to return from operations in the Mediterranean theater.

HTH,

HLdeZ/DGS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net