Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 19th July 2011, 17:08
Andy Saunders Andy Saunders is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South East England
Posts: 1,353
Andy Saunders is on a distinguished road
Re: Plans to raise a Halifax II

If I may say so, I believe that the notion of such sites being "war graves" is simply something that has been engineered by the MOD, and Air Ministry before it, probably, to slip into the British psyche over many years via the news media and various public statements over many years. Let me explain! And no, I am not trying to be provocative.

My belief is that this could well have been a cynical attempt, originally, to cover the embarrassment and awkward questions raised of successive British governments in relation to many many thousands of "missing" aircrew around the world who have never been recovered. The fact of the matter is that when the MREU's stopped work c.1949 it was simply declared that the responsibility of the CWGC had been discharged by inscription of names of the missing on memorials such as Runnymede. In this respect, no criticism is intended or implied of the CWGC who are beyond reproach. Their commemoration through memorials is done, ultimately, at the behest of the government. Theirs is not the responsibility for recovery of the missing.

To the best of my knowledge Britain is the only country in the world who take the view that such sites are "war graves"....which, of course, they are not. One only has to look at the American stance to see such a difference in thinking.

It is a complex and emotive issue, with many different view points. However, it is the policy that I would question and criticise and most certainly not the MOD JCCC staff who do a magnificent job dealing with casualties when they are found on a reactive basis. Clearly, the UK is never going to get into a pro-active MOD recovery route and has got itself locked into a policy of not supporting recoveries of missing men stating that it supports a policy of non-disturbance. Unfortunately, the view of missing airmen's relatives (when casualties are found) is contrary to that viewpoint.

I have covered such cases in "Finding The Few" and "Finding The Foe" and look at wider issues and cases in the forthcoming "Finding The Fallen" which, I might add, has had 'official' input from both the UK and US perspectives.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loss of 462SQN RAAF Halifax, 14 July 43 Nick Hector Allied and Soviet Air Forces 4 11th January 2007 09:25
About a Halifax shot down on 22/23 May 1944 near Blois canonne Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 1 26th August 2006 23:39
Halifax JP247 shot down over Yugoslavia chrisjay Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 9 19th March 2006 09:18
Halifax bombed over Montorgueil 25/6/44 melaniejane Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 0 29th December 2004 21:41


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net