![]() |
|
Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: F4U-1A
Theory
There was a C and a D and some historian, not understanding the USN system and thinking it worked in the same way as the USAAF, decided there must be an A and a B to fill the gap. Conveniently there were two different canopies, surely they must denote the missing sub types! Theory may fall down as I do not know what would constitute the B Martin |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: F4U-1A
The listing of Bureau Numbers for Naval aircraft at http://www.history.navy.mil/avh-1910/APP09.PDF does not show F4U-1A, only F4U-1 (and 1C and 1D). This is from the
Appendices from United States Naval Aviation 1910-1995 However, checking actual USMC flight logs I find the use of F4U-1A quite frequent. I suspect -1C and -1D to be official USN usage, and -1A to be informal "in the field" usage, based on the Army's use of A, B, C, D, etc to indicate changes. Enjoy! Frank.
__________________
Civilization is the most fragile ecology of all. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: F4U-1A
Thanks Frank.
I eventually found out the answer. See the attached scan from the book "F4U Corsair" by Nicholas A. Veronico et al, Motorbooks, 1994. In fact, the designation F4U-1A was only officially approved in May 1944. But at that time, Vought was building F4U-1Ds, Goodyear FG-1Ds and Brewster had gone out of business. Thus, not a single F4U-1/FG-1/F3A-1 with bubble canopy ever sported the suffix "A" on the rudder. That settles the matter once and for all. Thanks to all. Chris Last edited by CJE; 30th September 2015 at 10:44. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: F4U-1A
Quote:
The BuAer issued exhaustive lists of suffixes with their meanings. You can find them on the net very easily. Among other modifications: "B" stood for "aircraft built for the British under Lend-Lease". "C" was for cannon-armed aircraft. "D" was for drop tanks. Right on spot as far as the Corsair is concerned. The only one-off designation regarding the Corsair was the night-fighter version, which was designed F4U-2, while it should have been F4U-1N. But at that time, night-fighters were probably new to the BuAer and they had not yet made their mind up as how call them. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: F4U-1A
Thank You Chris.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: F4U-1A
However, I do believe that there are two designations that were taken the other way round by air historians hitherto and concern the FG-1 and FG-1A.
As far as I can ascertain, the FG-1 was a "denavalized" version earmarked for the USMC, while the FG-1A did have an arrester hook (but no folding wings or flottation devices). This is the only reason why you can find FG1-As aboard US carriers in 1945 but no FG-1s. If you look through the "A" suffixes of the BuAer, this specific case is mentionned with for example the SOC-3A, which indeed was a land-based aircraft equiped with an arrester hook. And once again, the "A" suffix has nothing to see with the canopy. All this leads me to believe that Green, Tillman, Bowman and many other renowned authors got it wrong: the F4U-1A never had any legal existence. So many people can't be wrong but sometimes they are. Veronico's explanation seems to have legs (see previous posts). However, at the time Vought's permission to distinguish its variant with the new canopy with an "A" suffix would have been granted, May 1944, the BuAer had already issued its exhaustive list for suffixes, excluding a change of canopy. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: F4U-1A
NATURALLY my F4U files are unavailable, stored somewhere in that warehouse with the Ark of the Covenant. Hard to believe the Naval Institute Book was published in 19-ought-79. However...
The -1A designation appeared on a Vought/LTV timeline that the PR shop provided me during the research phase. I suspect that it was (or became) a company designation that was not formally adopted by BuAer. But I do know that some squadrons made the distinction, including VF-17. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: F4U-1A
I suspect that it was (or became) a company designation that was not formally adopted by BuAer.
You make my day. Chris |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: F4U-1A
Found this report that uses the term F4U-1A,
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...f4u-1a-ads.jpg This report uses the term F4U-1A (BuNo 17930) through out. It also seems to indicate two seperate models, F4U-1 (02390) & F4U-1A (17930) http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...1-navycomp.pdf |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Caleb Flerk and an F4U Corsair .. | chicoartist | Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East | 0 | 4th May 2009 18:06 |
Original F4U Corsair Service Handbooks | Revi16 | On Offer | 0 | 21st June 2007 21:07 |
"Some Trouble of a Serrious Nature" (F4U) | chicoartist | Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East | 1 | 27th December 2006 19:57 |