Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

[Jim P.]

I had WNr. 740723 in my db as well, but I also had a FB entry for WNr. 440723 that should help confirm Matti's conclusion.

Bf 109G-6, 740723, ./., , III., 9., JG 26, weiße, 1 + |, , , 25-May-44, Bombenwurf., , FR, Beale, http://www.ghostbombers.com/miscellany/raid/raid_1.html, , Fl.Pl. Nancy, b, F, , 07.39~,

Bf 109G-6, 440723, KEMETHMÜLLER, Ofhr. Heinz, 89, III., 9., JG 26, weiße, 1 + |, , , 10-Apr-44, Transit flight to Etain on this date.., RK., FR, FB H. Kemethmüller, , Fl.Pl. Vendeville, -, H, , ,

[ouidjat]

Thank you Jim.

Matti wrote "obviously"!..

Regards, Franck.

[Rasmussen]

Originally Posted by Jim P.

Bf 109G-6, 440723, KEMETHMÜLLER, Ofhr. Heinz, 89, III., 9., JG 26, weiße, 1 + |, , , 10-Apr-44, Transit flight to Etain on this date.., RK., FR, FB H. Kemethmüller, , Fl.Pl. Vendeville, -, H, , ,

Hmmm ... the W.Nr.440723 I have with an training flight in Neubiberg on 17.04.1944, the a/c from 10.04.1944 was the W.Nr.440662.

Best regards
Rasmussen

[ouidjat]

Originally Posted by Rasmussen

Hmmm ... the W.Nr.440723 I have with an training flight in Neubiberg on 17.04.1944, the a/c from 10.04.1944 was the W.Nr.440662.

Best regards
Rasmussen

And? Sorry but, and? ... "Allô?, non mais Allô quoi!"

What are the consequences of that on the "740723" transmitted by Nick's site?
Still Weisse 1 of 9./JG 26 during the same (even better) laps of time.

Did Jim got his references from a secondary source?
Did Rasmussen got his references from the same FB? (would be surprising to find TWO FBs)

This is what I call "the collateral damages of the sibilline team"!

At least, I prefer a wrong but clear and honest WNr. given by Nick than one "I know but I won't tell you".

Another Browny job!

Last: at least Rasmussen can you give us the other data concerning those two flights you're talking about? Thanks for your help.

Regards, Franck.

PS: In these conditions Nick is right saying "If you can resolve this question, I'll correct my web site!"

[Rasmussen]

Originally Posted by ouidjat

What are the consequences of that on the "740723" transmitted by Nick's site?

What's your problem, ouidjat?

Of course it hadn't to do with an complete other time frame or such an thing. It was an little annotation to Jim's post, an question maybe because my source was the same: an copy of the Kemethmüller flightbook ... not more not less.

No reason for your pathetic answer.

Best regards
Rasmussen