55. IAP and 67. IAP on 22.06.1941 on the web

[John Beaman]

Past studies devoted to the description of events 22 June 1941 contain a number of factual errors, eg. publications done by Christer Bergstrom and Denes Bernard & Dymitryji Karlenko. Sometimes, these authors write in the works of historical fiction, which has nothing to do with what actually happened on June 22, 1941

Mirek: Great news about the books. However I would not say that Denes Bernard & Dymitryji Karlenko are writing "fiction".

They worked with what they had. Be kind.

[Dénes Bernád]

Originally Posted by John Beaman

...I would not say that Denes Bernard & Dymitryji Karlenko are writing "fiction".

They worked with what they had. Be kind.

Off topic (but must be said). Unfortunately, it's a returning pattern that Mirek Wawrzynski is attacking me personally on various forums, accusing me of numerous things, which are useless to be repeated here.
I am asking the moderators to keep a close eye on this thread, so it would not go off hand. Thank you.

[Mirek Wawrzynski]

To John

Mirek: Great news about the books. However I would not say that Denes Bernard & Dymitryji Karlenko are writing "fiction".

When I say it I 100% know what I have said, and susatain. Of coures both authors done good job many interesting facts, but I have seen in several sentences are writing pure historical fiction, and mumbo-jumbo. You may not see them but I see and know (concerning 22.06.1941 and earlier).

Of course maga mubo-jumbo are in Ch.B.'s books about Barbarosas but it is off topics too, waste of time.

mw
PS

Or someone makes a solid and reliable job, or not. If someone writes in several places obvious nonsense it is not robust work.

[Mirek Wawrzynski]

2 B.D.

Off topic (but must be said). Unfortunately, it's a returning pattern that Mirek Wawrzynski is attacking me personally on various forums, accusing me of numerous things, which are useless to be repeated here.
I am asking the moderators to keep a close eye on this thread, so it would not go off hand. Thank you.

It is understood that one's ego can be as big as a balloon. Someone may be sensitive to a young and timid virgin. In total, little I care!

It is not none attack persoanlny only show that someone in their work sometimes writes evident nonsense. It did not want to be that person accept that it's his business.

Or is a responsible and credible or not?

See the link

http://www.worldwar2.ro/forum/index.php?showtopic=6886


There are several examples of mumbo-jumbo done by B.D.,

Regards,

mw
I propose to close this discution - total waste of time.

[John Beaman]

Mireck:

Please desist from posting comments about people's sensitivity, motives, etc. This is not web site for judgments about people's personality, etc. Stay with facts and sources.

If you do not, consequences will follow.

[Mirek Wawrzynski]

John,
I can say again

I propose to close this discution - total waste of time.

Regards,
mw

[Jukka Juutinen]

Interestingly, neither in this thread or in the linked one does Mirek provide any sources beyond "Mirek says so". Surely Mirek can provide source noting that meets proper scientific standards...Or can he?

[mars]

Originally Posted by Dénes Bernád

Off topic (but must be said). Unfortunately, it's a returning pattern that Mirek Wawrzynski is attacking me personally on various forums, accusing me of numerous things, which are useless to be repeated here.
I am asking the moderators to keep a close eye on this thread, so it would not go off hand. Thank you.

It may be a little bit out of topic, but Mr Bernad, could you let just know when your book "Magyar Warriors" will be available?

[Dénes Bernád]

Off topic. Thank you for your interest in my long-running book project, 'Magyar Warriors'.
I can report that recently the Publisher has sent me the book layout for proofreading. In the meantime, the manuscript swelled to such an extent, due to the extra photos, that it will be divided in three parts, i.e. three volumes. Chances are that vol. 1 will be published by Christmas, but I will only believe it when I will see it...

[Mirek Wawrzynski]

The math does not need scientific stanarów. If in one place, someone writes about 40 and the other 17 is what we prove. 2 + 2 = 40 or 2 + 2 = 17?

You have to be able to read the text with understanding, this is a rare art, but instead it is easy to be indignant.

Someone prove scientifically that the number of aircraft in the squadron fighter can reach 40 pieces is pure nonsense. Of course you can specify the size and number of full-time aircraft based on the document, but what for?


The book is written by B. D. does not hold scientific Standards, so what's going on. He writes because he thinks so. I just write because I have more robust data