![]() |
|
|||||||
| Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Disadvantages of the airplane structure FW 200
Additionally the Fw 200 was built under the guise of a passenger aircraft/airliner. The design load would have been evenly distributed to account for passengers but possibly a smaller region of load for baggage.
Ideally, baggage (and bomb load) would be placed near the airframe cg but I am unfamiliar with the layout of the Fw 200. While fatigue is a possibility, I doubt that there were enough reversible loads to account for this - particularly if you compare to an airframe like a UH-1 Huey that experiences a full reversible load due to the Pylon and rotor system - which shakes it +- 1.2G nearly forever.
__________________
" The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zerstorer Staffel Er. Kdo 25 | Peter Kassak | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 7 | 8th April 2014 22:37 |
| I./ & IV./JG51 losses, Velikije Luki, 11.1942 - 01.43 | Evgeny Velichko | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 9 | 4th August 2013 23:20 |
| Sept 1942 Fw-189 Stalingrad area losses | James A Pratt III | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 1 | 6th April 2013 01:05 |
| sg10 in July 1944 | keith A | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 14th June 2012 14:46 |
| Fw 200 Condor Questions for 1939-40 Profile Layouts | Larry Hickey | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 7th April 2012 13:16 |