![]() |
|
|||||||
| Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 74. Squadron Spitfire lost on 21.5.1940
do not know if this helps but
ZP-J 22.05.40 Aubert in K9867 force landed at Berck-sur-Mer Last edited by Kaiyan; 7th February 2021 at 10:17. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 74. Squadron Spitfire lost on 21.5.1940
Hi Kaiyan,
I ave info about this machine (and more photos), but Í m interesting in machine lost day before and issue with serial number-machine could not be lost in 2 different days.......... Faenor |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 74. Squadron Spitfire lost on 21.5.1940
hi all,
the right serial number is K9957 : http://discovery.nationalarchives.go...ls/r/C14501981 http://allspitfirepilots.org/aircraft/K9957 Solved from my side. Faenor |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 74. Squadron Spitfire lost on 21.5.1940
Faenor
Interesting topic! There is a problem with both dates and aircraft here. If we concentrate on the pilot, what Kaiyan says is that many sources list P/O R.D. Aubert as having force landed on the 22nd and not 21st as stated in BofF. If we then concentrate on the aircraft K9977 is listed as lost on 30.12.1939 by all other sources I have as well, so I think we can be pretty safe BofF is wrong when saying Aubert flow that aircraft, either on the 21st or 22nd. Aircraft K9867 also creates a problem, since its record card seems to say it was lost on the 23rd and not 21st (or even 22nd) I think that Peter (in some other context) said he had relied and checked upon all the ORB available. I can't remember if he also said he counter balanced his details with what had been checked on the record cards or not, but hopefully he gets around reading this and makes his own comments. You also have to remember this was a very tough period for the British. They were basically on the verge of loosing the war and record keeping was probably one of the least promoted aspects they were facing, so there is bound to be many official discrepancies around. Cheers Stig PS: Yes indeed K9957 could be a good candidate since it is recorded as missing on the 21st. Last edited by Stig Jarlevik; 12th March 2018 at 12:32. Reason: Added comment |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 74. Squadron Spitfire lost on 21.5.1940
Hi Stig,
yes, this is interesting topic, same like Hawker Hurricanes during same period (start WWII to Battle of Britain). Plane K9867 ZP-J was lost 23.5.1940 - S/Ldr. F.L.White forced-landed at Calais-Marck. During few hours was rescued by pilots of 54. Sq with Miles Magister covered by 2 pilots. http://www.bbm.org.uk/airmen/as-leathart.htm - there is wrong date http://www.bbm.org.uk/airmen/AllenJL.htm In this link and info about S/Ldr. White, there is photo of pilots 74.Sq - some of them was shot-down during Dynamo operation and some of later. http://www.bbm.org.uk/airmen/WhiteFL.htm From my view, in the excellent book Battle of France Then and Now, there is just the typo - wrongly K9977 and right one is K9957 But - maybe I´m wrong :-) I´m just amateur in this part of history :-) Faenor |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 74. Squadron Spitfire lost on 21.5.1940
Hi
If the ZPJ could have been the K9867 the photo of this a/c is not taken at Calais-Marck The airfield is absolutely flat flat flat The hill behind looks better close to Berk-sur-Mer Bertrand |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any dispute about interpreting the BofB? | tcolvin | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 57 | 17th October 2010 22:31 |
| Thunderbolts and Mustangs versus the Jagdwaffe (split topic) | Ruy Horta | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 98 | 9th August 2007 17:22 |
| Order of battle RAF & B.E.F. on May 10,1940 | fredcompa | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 20th November 2006 22:23 |
| 56th FG - friendly fire case on 4 May 1943 - info needed | Lagarto | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 28 | 13th March 2005 00:33 |
| The remarkable William Tex Ash, 24 March '42 | Brendan | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 4th February 2005 19:55 |