![]()  | 
	
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| Books and Magazines Please use this forum to review or discuss books and magazines. | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				Re: Myths and Legends of the Eastern Front: Reassessing the Great Patriotic War [off topic]
			 
			The problem with this book that it is not about history but about ideology. The previous books of it's author - Boris Sokolov - are purely publicistic in nature. It's just no more than replacing of "positive" myth with "negative" one. 
		
		
		
		
		
			As a result, as Boris Sokolov shows in this powerful and thought-provoking study, the heroic and tragic side of the war is highlighted while the dark side – the incompetent, negligent and even criminal way the war was run – is overlooked This fragment alone shows how out of touch the author is with the subject Judging by the previous works of this author, in my opinion it's better to avoid this book 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Regards, Andrei  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				Re: Myths and Legends of the Eastern Front: Reassessing the Great Patriotic War [off topic]
			 
			Quote: 
	
 Yeah, the author managed to make an insult to both Soviet and Germans with a single sentence  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				Re: Myths and Legends of the Eastern Front: Reassessing the Great Patriotic War [off topic]
			 
			Quote: 
	
 I think it had been done intentionally precisely with that aim. There are some alarming attempts in media to re-ignite mutual hostility in central-eastern Europe recently. Results of such hostility are predictable - all would-be participants will suffer, third parties will benefit and certain Yale professors will lecture the world about "bloodlands" To smash opposing air force is only one of the missions of an air arm. And if this opposing air force is insignificant factor due to its humble strength, so the mission of its destruction is not of top priority. In other words - the Soviets had not have to fight for air superiority. It was theirs by default thanks to the implementation of one of the key prinicples of war - force concentration 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Regards, Andrei  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				Re: Myths and Legends of the Eastern Front: Reassessing the Great Patriotic War [off topic]
			 
			Reigniting hostility is required in the present so that the 'enemy' is clearly identified as a threat. The Polish government recently bought an Anti-Ballistic Missile system from the US. That sort of thing goes over with the people a lot better the more they feel threatened. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Here, my only goal is to help fill in the blanks. And that includes books that may only briefly touch upon air operations so that researchers wondering why aircraft that were deployed here or there were ordered to do so. Regards, Ed  |