![]() |
|
|||||||
| Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An article of interest
John - good article and a lightning rod.
I consider myself a fact driven person and have learned a lot over the last 20+ years of serious archive study - and learned to reach out to other sources than microfilm histories. Having said that, the mission summaries kept by serious squadron/group historians are always a good reference and this source appears to be the root of the controversy. At the risk of being bombarded I have never believed it possible that any single Fighter Group could ever achieve the distinction against the Luftwaffe over an 18 month plus span in the ETO... escorting Heavies to attack oil and airframe targets - which both the 12th and 15th AF did. The route and escort assignments have too many variables with respect to execution to conceive that a.) the 332nd was always where they were assigned, b.) their assigned herd was on time and in good formation, c.) that a sharp Luftwaffe Controller didn't pick up a scenario where local Luftwaffe superiority could be exploited... and d.) that the definition of 'no loss' could be narrowed to only the bombers they were actually covering instead of the ones they were assigned to cover. What I have always been prepared to believe is that the discipline of 'sticking to the bombers' was so compelling because of the political focus of race, that the squadrons just didn't break formation and go after large gaggles in the fear that another German force would attack the vacated position. In my opinion, this is why the 332nd did not have a single fighter pilot that a.) claimed 5 destroyed in the air or b.) was awarded credt for 5. I could find reference after reference for 4thFG, 56th FG, 352nd FG, 355th FG, 357FG, etc that clearly showed aggressive mistakes were made in chasing german fighters or that all particular groups were overwhelmed because they were locally inferior in strength and covering too many bombers to prevent them from being shot down. Inconceivable that the 332nd never experienced this type of misfortune. Regards, Bill Marshall |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An article of interest
Well, were not they the worsest FG of 15th AF in term of credited victories? Perhaps PC was a reason to look for a claim that would prove Redtails superiority in some regard.
Anyway, it seems it is a typical case. People in their 80s or 90s are rather less than open minded, and it is hard to discuss events from their past, especially when they feel this leads to belittlening of their achievements. On the other hand, there is plenty of plenty of publicists or researchers, who would make sensation of anything just to promote theirselves, and not caring, that it may hurt third parties. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An article of interest
From what I have read, it is fair to say that the 332nd were under intense scrutiny. Had they ever gone free-hunting and left the bombers exposed to enemy fighters, they would have received more severe criticism than any other fighter group in a similar position.
However, this does raise a tactical point that has niggled at me for some time. There is no doubt that Doolittle's tactic of ending fighters ahead of the bomber stream did result in more Luftwaffe fighter losses. However, it is rarely pointed out that this was made possible by the steadily increasing numbers of escort fighters available. Although fighter groups were freed to roam a-hunting, others remained in close contact with the bomber stream. It was less a switch of tactics than an addition. Whenever the bomber force was left unprotected by fighters, the Luftwaffe seized their opportunities and bombers were lost. Parallels can be drawn with the use of hunter-killer groups in the Atlantic war. When excort numbers were limited, forming hunter-killer groups weakened the convoys and left them vulnerable. As escort numbers rose, it was possible to form these groups and, more importantly, breaking the enemy codes meant they were not searching blindly but could go to the right areas for the U-boats. Can this parallel be extended to the use of the Scouting aircraft of the 8th, going out ahead of the main force to pass information back, not just to the bombers but to the fighter escorts too? I'm aware of the existence of these scouts, but have read little of their operational significance and precise roles. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Air Combat Collection article on Me 262 | Richard T. Eger | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 0 | 18th November 2006 16:24 |
| Koichiro Abe's Ta 152 article in "Scale Aviation" magazine. | hikki | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 17 | 26th June 2006 23:52 |
| Article of K. Scheer (4./NJG 100) - Fw 189 night fighter photo | Kari Lumppio | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 9th June 2005 14:12 |
| He 112 article in Flugzeug Extra, No. 01/2005 | Dénes Bernád | Books and Magazines | 5 | 28th April 2005 22:26 |
| Franek Grabowski´s article about 133 Wing on 7 June 1944 | Ota Jirovec | Books and Magazines | 2 | 14th April 2005 17:36 |