He 111 V28, V29 & V30

[AndyMa]

Thanks for the info.
Would it not be more likely that:
He 111H-2 W.Nr.6871 PB+NB sam,e as for V29.
He 111H-3 W.Nr. 6870 DB+NA no tasks reported.
would be either PB+NB, PB+NA, or DB+NB, DB+NA (so a typo in the record for one of them?)
Also, both are He111H-3

[Nick Beale]

Thanks, everyone.

Since the document I was quoting says that the three protoypes are fitted with the Jumo 211 D, I think it's pretty clear that the three H-models are the ones in question.

[edNorth]

Originally Posted by AndyMa

Thanks for the info.
Would it not be more likely that:
He 111H-2 W.Nr.6871 PB+NB sam,e as for V29.
He 111H-3 W.Nr. 6870 DB+NA no tasks reported.
would be either PB+NB, PB+NA, or DB+NB, DB+NA (so a typo in the record for one of them?)
Also, both are He111H-3

Both are "interpolated" made before sequential Stkz. were ordered (late 18.10.1939) and such quirks in this period are known and one must be careful. Further report on them three (RJ+NE / DB+NA / PB+NB Weser conversions on F 5 Torpedoes and LMA 3 and LMB 3 mines) is in KdE Rechlin report {T177 R39 P842 (#3730367) and T321 R57 P56 is Tr List as in RL 36/294} curiously one is said with DB 601 A engines but not Jumo 211 (something is suspect here) and just one is stated V-muster
Ju 88 as LT aircraft (known already by 06.39) were stated cancelled before 06.05.40 (its on the missing page - and elsewhere, RM 7/2386 P100) to reappear with two more He 111 H-5 W.Nr. 3887 and 3890 in 1941. Ju 88 does not need have been assigned any designation if not built.