![]() |
|
|||||||
| Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?
Hello Graham
sorry, I had to take the twice a week sauna session before answering. On IL-2 successes on anti-shipping role. I cannot remember how the sinkings by Soviet naval aviation divided between ac types but IIRC Bostons/Havocs were clearly most successful type maybe Il-4s/DB-3Fs second but our Russian friends surely know this better. My point still is that the 700 kg? armour weight was too much in anti-shipping role. 8 - 12mm armour kept out rifle calibre bullets, maybe halved, one must remember that wings, rear fuselage and tail were unarmoured, the effects of 20mm AAA, and somewhat reduced the effects of 37 - 40mm AAA. But it probably didn't give any meaningful protection against 4" - 5" AA fire, which was the principal AA weapon of naval units. That's my point. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KG51 Me 262 claims / confirmed kills & Me 262 9K+BH | Roger Gaemperle | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 27th November 2017 21:44 |
| Me 262 wn 111755 | FRANCESCO M LENTINI | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 29th November 2006 02:53 |
| VVS divisions | Mike35nj | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 7th August 2006 13:27 |
| Losses of B-17's in RCM role | paul peters | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 4 | 15th February 2006 20:57 |
| Bomber Aces | Jim Oxley | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 18 | 14th October 2005 19:46 |