![]() |
|
|||||||
| Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Placing the Fairey Battle.
[quote=Franek Grabowski;47195 Concerning Typhoon - yes it was outdated as well. Airfoil used is not the thing that should have taken place. They have realised that and build Tempest, but too late.[/quote]
What a BS statement. When fitted with similar propeller (4-blade) and Sabre alowing the same boost, the Tempest was a huge 15 mph (less than 4%) faster than the Typhoon at 20,000 ft and its service ceiling was a massive 1500 feet better (according to Mason´s Typhoon/Tempest book). The Tempest´s critical Mach number was a whopping 0.02 Mach (according to Brown´s Testing for Combat) improvement over that of the Typhoon, a huge 2.5%. Perhaps in Poland you can transform obsolescence into magnificence by a 4% improvement. After all, there is "Polish inverse logic" as used by HP calculators...
__________________
"No man, no problem." Josef Stalin possibly said...:-) |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 12 SQUADRON FAIREY BATTLE L4949 | malcolmjameswilson | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 4 | 4th May 2007 18:15 |
| Downed Fairey Battle D-RH | Griffon | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 8 | 23rd July 2006 10:12 |
| Battle Of Britain Books | Jim Oxley | Books and Magazines | 3 | 13th March 2006 06:56 |
| Claims identites | Adam | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 3 | 27th May 2005 01:05 |
| Non-Operational Unit victories in the Battle of Britain | Larry | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 7th January 2005 00:05 |