![]() |
|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
Perhaps the answer can be found in period F-series pilot or parts manuals.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
Seems to be a "less well documented" part of the Bf 109. However, when studying photos of F-2 and F-4 versions I get the impression that the horizontal top roof part is divided into two parts, enabling the front part to slide under the aft and fixed perspex part. On some photos it is visible that the front part is located slightly lower that the aft part, enabling it to slide under.....
The "slot" is more likely a piece glued to the moving front perspex part enabling better grip when sliding it. A photo of Wick in an E-4 cockpit on page 117 in "Major Helmut Wick" by Herbert Ringstetter, Motorbuch Verlag, in my opinion shows such a transparent "handle" pointing downwards, perpendicular to the top horizontal front perspex part - Visible as a "white" part contrasting against the darker metal frame. Goran |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
How thick was the top glazing of the 109 canopy?
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
The "Ersatzteil-Liste Bf 109 F" from April 1941 show on page 32 the follow.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
Quote:
I get the impression that this feature can be found starting with the type of canopy introduced with the E-4 and then running with the F-series. I have seen one picture where the top panel seems to have been opened, judging from the position of the "handle" piece. Pressurized canopies do not seem to have this function which is quite understandable. Later on the G-versions seem to have a fixed top panel instead of the sliding one??? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi,
Hopefully to knock this one on the head, spoke to my contact again highlighting this thread - he stated categorically that it was definitely NOT a slot and that it was a perspex (plexiglas) bar for moving the top panel back and forth. He recalls a thickness of up to 5mm and that it was not bullet proof. I hadn't quite appreciated how emphatic he was intending to be first time I spoke to him on the subject, my hearing will be back to normal soon! I agree with SP that any form of slot wouldn't be a good idea as regards water getting in! So, has anyone got any decent pics, maybe even from a restored or relic aircraft? Regards, David |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
Molders' a/c and the last two pictured make it pretty clear that there is a separate clear panel in the front half of the canopy top section. It opens by pulling back the perpex ridge at the front. Now, why would they want it?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi,
Thanks for the pics Lynn! George, could the panel just be for cooling /ventilation as with the side windows, firing flares out of etc? The 109 having a side flipover canopy maybe wasn't as easy to ventilate as, say, the Fw190 where it's canopy could be rolled back almost any chosen distance up to it's stops. The operation manual/handbook for the aircraft may possibly indicate it's use. Regards, David |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?!
Hard to say? But would it be possible for the pilot to squeeze out through the top panel if slid back in an emergency? say if the canopy was damaged in combat and would not open?
Kevin
__________________
"Wer zuerst schiesst hat mehr von leben" |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Markings + codes of Bf 109 + Legion Condor | Hohentwiel | Pre-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation | 23 | 23rd April 2019 17:25 |
Documentation of 2000HP Bf 109s of 1945 | Kurfürst | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 10th September 2009 12:15 |
Some 109 flight tests here - http://www.kurfurst.bravehost.c | Kurfürst | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 6 | 18th July 2006 14:19 |
Awaited, 1945 Luftwaffe Fighter units evolution ? | O.Menu | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 9 | 6th July 2005 13:32 |
Inconsistancy in quoted Me 109 G6 performance? | Anders Jonsson | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 15th January 2005 15:23 |