Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 4th August 2008, 02:45
drgondog's Avatar
drgondog drgondog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 912
drgondog is on a distinguished road
Re: Performance of the Fw 190A on the Deck?

[quote=Graham Boak;70211]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post

Weight very much affects our aircrafts envelope. It has a direct relationship with velocity.

V2/V1 = SQRT(W2/W1)

[End quote]

No. Weight affects the envelope, indeed, but the direct relationship is wrong. For aircraft of this vintage, it is probably true that induced drag has a linear relationship with weight, but induced drag is only part of the story. The effect of weight on speed varies with altitude, because it varies with induced drag only, and induced drag increases with altitude (at any given speed). At low altitude and high speed, the drag term is dominated by the zero-lift drag. This is made up of skin friction drag, profile drag and excrescence drag, none of which vary with weight.

Induced Drag varies as the square of CL, and for a 5% weight increase - CL varies 5% if speed constant. CL varies directly with Weight for level flight.

At max speed and power settings the same ship at 1.06 W (a P-51D versus B-15) using same engine and TO fuel weight, same aerodynamics but heavier frame by 500-600 pounds can not achieve the lower weight max V.. so AoA increases slightly to get new CL which must increase by 6% to maintain equilibrium.


For high altitudes and low speeds, the effect is reversed, as the drag is dominated by the lift-induced drag, and the top left corner of the envelope is notably smaller at higher weight. The bottom right is hardly affected.

I made my living doing these sums. There's a lot about aircraft performance I never knew, but I think this is fairly basic.

The rest of the posting is sound, and a very useful addition.
Graham, what you say about low speed/low altitude versus high speed/low altitude is true relative to discussions about relative induced drag and parasite drag

But whether the extra weigh is due to increased fuel, or internal load, or more structural weight for same basic airframe, the Velocity change for same power settings and the increased AoA resulting in a higher CL results in the SQRT (Wheavy/Wlight) change in V
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most One Sided Luftwaffe Victory over the 8th Air Force Rob Romero Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 22 18th August 2010 23:55
Fw 190A <III of II./JG 26 CJE Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 25th February 2007 16:36
Spitfire losses January 22nd, 1943 Jochen Prien Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 14th September 2006 02:35
Aircraft performance curves Christer Bergström Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 17 19th November 2005 22:49
Low altitude tests: P-47 vs. Fw 190 Six Nifty .50s Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 4 20th April 2005 01:13


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net