Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 25th July 2006, 23:02
Rasmussen Rasmussen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lower Saxony, Germany
Posts: 691
Rasmussen is on a distinguished road
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Hello Ferdinando,

many thanks for your reply (my copy of your newest book is in my second flat -- it's an wonderful book). So my question: Were these a/c's reported as "G - 14" in other documents? IIRC he doesn't mentioned an version in his agenda.

Best wishes to you and your family
Jörg
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 25th July 2006, 23:51
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,188
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: Bf109 G or K?

In case it helps: a list of thirteen Bf 109 G-14s taken over by I./JG 4 from Erla Leipzig on 18 and 19 October 1944. Eleven of them are 464... series aircraft.

(The original document was very faint, so I've had to do a lot of computer adjustment to make it readable)
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 26th July 2006, 00:17
veltro veltro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 444
veltro is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Fantastic stuff, Nick!

Jörg, thanks for your kind words. Now you can see why with Nick we did an excellent job years ago... still a great team, IMHO...
__________________
All the best,

Ferdinando D'Amico
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 26th July 2006, 02:00
Rasmussen Rasmussen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lower Saxony, Germany
Posts: 691
Rasmussen is on a distinguished road
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Quote:
Originally Posted by veltro
Fantastic stuff, Nick!
I agree Ferdinando. It helped to find out 2 little mistakes in my documents and it seems to confirm my conclusion that Erla sold G - 14's (relating original documents independent from technical equipments) and RLM registered the "special" G - 14's (without MW 50) as G - 6 (relating original documents from Artie Bob).

an small addition: all a/c's were brandnew ... accepted by BAL one or two days before were send to JG 4 (independent from the W.Nr.)

@Nick Beale

My English is very limited so my question: means "equipment sets: lacking" that the MW 50 - System was lacking?

Best wishes and many thanks
Jörg
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 26th July 2006, 10:06
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,188
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rasmussen
My English is very limited so my question: means "equipment sets: lacking" that the MW 50 - System was lacking?
That would be my guess too, but only a guess. Elsewhere, when III./JG 53 reported some aircraft lacking radios, they specifically said radios - they did not call those just "equipment."
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 14th August 2006, 19:41
Rasmussen Rasmussen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lower Saxony, Germany
Posts: 691
Rasmussen is on a distinguished road
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Beale
That would be my guess too, but only a guess. Elsewhere, when III./JG 53 reported some aircraft lacking radios, they specifically said radios - they did not call those just "equipment."
Maybe from interest for you:

from an FS (= Fernschreiben) by technical director of Erla - Leipzig, Waldemar Schellhorn, to Mtt. Regensburg

date: 18.October 1944

"In diesem Monat haben wir die G - 14 als Schulmaschine ohne MW 50 - Anlage zu liefern und diese können Sie nicht gebrauchen."
(my translation: "In this month we have to delivere the G - 14 as trainer without MW 50 - system and this a/c isn't right for you.")

Best wishes
Rasmussen
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 14th August 2006, 21:32
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,188
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rasmussen
[u]"In diesem Monat haben wir die G - 14 als Schulmaschine ohne MW 50 - Anlage zu liefern und diese können Sie nicht gebrauchen."
Rasmussen
That is interesting but the German grammar doesn't seem right to me. Shouldn't it be "…und diese können Sie nicht brauchen"? = "and this you cannot need."

Even then it's an odd thing to say. I'd have expected either "…und diese brauchen Sie nicht" (= and this you do not need) or perhaps "sollen Sie nicht brauchen" (= you should not need).
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 14th August 2006, 22:33
Rasmussen Rasmussen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lower Saxony, Germany
Posts: 691
Rasmussen is on a distinguished road
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Quote:
... but the German grammar doesn't seem right to me. Shouldn't it be "…und diese können Sie nicht brauchen"? = "and this you cannot need."
No, it's correct ...as German native speaker I can confirm that the formulation " ... und diese können Sie nicht gebrauchen." is in common use. This formulation indicate an guess about an fact. Your second version "... und diese brauchen Sie nicht." indicate an fact (my knowledge about your need). The difference between both versions isn't great and often in indentical use. Your third version "... und sollen Sie nicht gebrauchen." is an direct order.

Best wishes
Rasmussen
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 14th August 2006, 23:10
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,188
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: Bf109 G or K?

Thanks Rasmussen.

I only learned the kind of German that enabled you to pass examinations in the English education system, not the sort Germans actually use. They certainly didn't teach us German words like "Look", "Team" and "Fitness" that one sees now!

I was doubtful because to say in English "you cannot need this" usually implies surprise that someone has asked for the item.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 15th August 2006, 23:59
red-star25's Avatar
red-star25 red-star25 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 144
red-star25 is on a distinguished road
Re: Bf109 G or K?

It´s interesting to see, that even in Jan 1945 64 G-6 were delivered by Erla, together with 103 G-10, 269 G-10/R6 and 78 G-14.
Messerschmitt had only 1 G-6, 3 G-10, 1 G-14, 211 G-14/AS and 338 K-4.
I did not expect to see this amount of aircraft delivered in this stage of war.

Dirk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indian Bf109 , Any news ? Alex Smart Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 16 28th April 2020 08:50
Newly discovered photo of Barkhorn's Bf109 Flavio Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 3 30th March 2006 00:21
Please help me trace a downed Battle of Britain BF109 Jon Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 4 13th November 2005 14:52
Bf109 W.Nr 2242 - Dora or Emil? markjsheppard Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 3 13th March 2005 12:02
Shark & Bf109 G-6/R6 pikas Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 26th February 2005 04:57


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net