Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd August 2006, 12:34
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

On some photographs, it seems to have the MG 17s reinstalled inboard of the MG FFs. Same for Müncheberg in Sicily.
Can someone confirm this fact?
Were some great JG 26 aces disappointed by the fire power of the 109?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 2nd August 2006, 13:39
Kuba Plewka's Avatar
Kuba Plewka Kuba Plewka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 77
Kuba Plewka
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

No no, it's a blinded MG 17 blast tube you see. MG 17 and MG-FF wasn't installed in the same place. While the wing was standarized for both kind of weapon, two fitting points in main wing spar were prepared. If MG-FF was installed, the hole where normally the blast tube for MG 17 was blinded. It seems, that sometimes it was patched with a soft material (fabric?).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd August 2006, 18:02
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

Sure?

Can you see the attached file? It's the first time I try to attach one and I don't know if I did it right.

Last edited by CJE; 14th April 2007 at 07:12.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd August 2006, 18:25
SMF144's Avatar
SMF144 SMF144 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yellowknife, NT., Canada
Posts: 378
SMF144
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

I can see the attachment.

Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd August 2006, 19:28
olefebvre olefebvre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 86
olefebvre
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

The Emil wing could not accomodate both weapons at the same time.
Usualy E-1 later converted to E-3/E-4/E-7 standards had their MG-17 holes covered by a metal sheet, it's visible on several pictures.
Wknr 5819 is odd since it was produced as an E-4/B but with the MG-17 holes still opened, they are just taped over. It might be specific to this small WNF batch.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd August 2006, 19:55
Kuba Plewka's Avatar
Kuba Plewka Kuba Plewka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 77
Kuba Plewka
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

I'd rather say, that in every wing this hole for MG 17 was cut and the "Verschlussdeckel" is listed in Ersatzteil-Liste from Januar 1941. Possibly, even when MG 17 were not installed in new built machines, the wing leading edge covering didn't change.
Maybe this soft patch is a remainder of coversion?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd August 2006, 20:09
olefebvre olefebvre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 86
olefebvre
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

Yes sorry of course the E-1 conversion used the same "patch" as the a/c produced as E-3/E-4... My point was that E-1 MG-17 holes were usualy faired over when conversion occured, but that was not very clear.
This a/c was no conversion, it was built from scratch as an E-4/B as underlined by its Wknr, there are other pictures of this a/c wings' leading edge showing the MG-17s holes just taped over.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd August 2006, 20:35
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

Soft patch? You must be kidding.
It's kind of a fairing over the edges of the trough hole!
What for if there is no machine-gun inside?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 2nd August 2006, 20:52
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Another one for the road

Galland.
Same installation.
If the bays were empty why has he not faired them over?
How come a Kommodore can fly with drag-inducing holes on his aircraft leading edges?

Last edited by CJE; 14th April 2007 at 07:12.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 2nd August 2006, 21:07
olefebvre olefebvre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 86
olefebvre
Re: Galland's Bf 109E-4/N, late 1940

According to Mtt test the fairing did not make much change if any in the performance department.
It was impossible to fit both weapons at the same time, the 60 rounds MG-FF Drum took over the space occupied by the MG-17, moreover the belt for the MG-17 would not have fit as well.

Btw do you have Müncheberg's a/c Wknr at hands ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Friendly fire WWII Brian Allied and Soviet Air Forces 803 8th July 2023 15:47
FW190a-3 /A4 AGr123 in France 1943 1944. Eric Larger Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 16 12th June 2011 09:29
Documentation of 2000HP Bf 109s of 1945 Kurfürst Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 10th September 2009 12:15
French hand over of downed Luftwaffe crews in 1940 Jon Allied and Soviet Air Forces 10 8th February 2006 20:30
Awaited, 1945 Luftwaffe Fighter units evolution ? O.Menu Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 9 6th July 2005 13:32


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:31.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net