Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10th February 2017, 12:14
Mr Schmitt Mr Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 205
Mr Schmitt is on a distinguished road
me109E1 or 3

Hi,

Does anyone know what variant me109E Werk Nr 5329 was or any information?

Thanks
Kind Regards Edward
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10th February 2017, 15:19
harrison987 harrison987 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,476
harrison987 is on a distinguished road
Re: me109E1 or 3

My info indicates it as being an E-4. PG+BW.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th February 2017, 21:10
G.R.Morrison G.R.Morrison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 455
G.R.Morrison
Bf 109E WNr.5329

The WNr.5329 was listed as a Bf 109E-7 of the II.(Schl.)/LG 2 when it had a take-off accident at Berzniki on the first day of Barbarossa (22-Jun-1941).

WNr.5329 in the 2./JG 106
30.August 1943 - Landing accident at Fl.Pl. Lachen-Speyerdorf, damaged 10%.
8.November 1943 - Pilot error at Fl.Pl. Lachen-Speyerdorf, damaged 25%.
11.April 1944 - Fw. Herbert Mayer killed in a crash due to technical failure near Landau; altitude sickness per Menke.

Hope this helps, GRM
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th February 2017, 13:30
Mr Schmitt Mr Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 205
Mr Schmitt is on a distinguished road
Re: me109E1 or 3

Hi Guys,

Thanks for the info thats very kind.

Would this have been for example, an Erla built E4 then converted to E7 or built E7?

Thanks again
Edward
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11th February 2017, 14:46
ju55dk's Avatar
ju55dk ju55dk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,108
ju55dk will become famous soon enough
Re: me109E1 or 3

From start it was an E-4. Build by WNF.

Junker
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11th February 2017, 14:50
Mr Schmitt Mr Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 205
Mr Schmitt is on a distinguished road
Re: me109E1 or 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by ju55dk View Post
From start it was an E-4. Build by WNF.

Junker
Thank you Junker,

When would this have been built?

Kind Regards
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th February 2017, 00:57
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,216
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enoughStig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: me109E1 or 3

Guys

Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328...
Annoying I know...even to me....

GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual

Thanks
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th February 2017, 01:48
ju55dk's Avatar
ju55dk ju55dk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,108
ju55dk will become famous soon enough
Re: me109E1 or 3

I also have it as Skz PG+BW.

Junker
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12th February 2017, 11:56
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,216
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enoughStig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: me109E1 or 3

Hi Junker

By 'it', do you mean WNr 5328 or 5329?

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13th February 2017, 10:14
ouidjat's Avatar
ouidjat ouidjat is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 3,636
ouidjat is on a distinguished road
Re: me109E1 or 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig Jarlevik View Post
Guys

Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328...
Annoying I know...even to me....

GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual

Thanks
Stig
Hi Stig,

According http://www.stammkennzeichen.de/index.php?pge=search and Peter van Gogh list (ex LEMB Stkz data list) WNr.5329 was PG+BW.
Note:
PG+BO was WNr.5296 then comes PG+BQ with WNr.5323 in Gogh list.
Stammkennzeichen list is a little bit different.
For them, PG+BR/5299 then PG+BS/5300 then PG+BT/5326 ...

Harrison's statement is correct according these two lists.

Cheers, Franck.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
me109e1 parts help please to identify... s.hyder Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 25th August 2013 18:31


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net