![]() |
|
|||||||
| Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
me109E1 or 3
Hi,
Does anyone know what variant me109E Werk Nr 5329 was or any information? Thanks Kind Regards Edward |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
My info indicates it as being an E-4. PG+BW.
Mike |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bf 109E WNr.5329
The WNr.5329 was listed as a Bf 109E-7 of the II.(Schl.)/LG 2 when it had a take-off accident at Berzniki on the first day of Barbarossa (22-Jun-1941).
WNr.5329 in the 2./JG 106 30.August 1943 - Landing accident at Fl.Pl. Lachen-Speyerdorf, damaged 10%. 8.November 1943 - Pilot error at Fl.Pl. Lachen-Speyerdorf, damaged 25%. 11.April 1944 - Fw. Herbert Mayer killed in a crash due to technical failure near Landau; altitude sickness per Menke. Hope this helps, GRM |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the info thats very kind. Would this have been for example, an Erla built E4 then converted to E7 or built E7? Thanks again Edward |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
From start it was an E-4. Build by WNF.
Junker |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
Thank you Junker,
When would this have been built? Kind Regards |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
Guys
Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328... ![]() Annoying I know...even to me.... ![]() GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual Thanks Stig |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
Quote:
According http://www.stammkennzeichen.de/index.php?pge=search and Peter van Gogh list (ex LEMB Stkz data list) WNr.5329 was PG+BW. Note: PG+BO was WNr.5296 then comes PG+BQ with WNr.5323 in Gogh list. Stammkennzeichen list is a little bit different. For them, PG+BR/5299 then PG+BS/5300 then PG+BT/5326 ... Harrison's statement is correct according these two lists. Cheers, Franck. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
Thanks Frank
The 109 is in fact a bit too big type for me to follow so I just quote what has basically been picked up here and there, and that unfortunately did not fit either of your listed sources. Looks like a lot of red herrings have been floating around in the ponds during long gone days.... ![]() Sorry about that... Cheers Stig |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: me109E1 or 3
I also have it as Skz PG+BW.
Junker |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| me109e1 parts help please to identify... | s.hyder | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 25th August 2013 19:31 |