|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ta152 loss
Quote:
1) First, Shaw didn't simply reported that the Fw190 was flying towards East, he reported that the E/A repeatedly broke from East to West (even before the fatal approach of the Tempest). "I saw a single Fw.190 flying east at deck level ... The 190 broke ... the E/A straightened out east ... the 190 broke rather later & again to port ... It was a full deflection shot & I opened fire ... I fired a long burst ... flames appeared from the port side". It means that the Fw was hit on the port (i.e. left) side while he was flying toward West (after some previous breaks), by Shaw positioned South respect to the German and flying towards NW (to fire his deflection shot). So we haven't a Fw "flying with East course" but a repeatedly turning Fw that was shot down while flying towards West. 2) The repeated breaking is really consistent with an unaware pilot (Sattler) trying to catch sight of his comrades already engaged into the near battle. Had Skupina, flying alone, quite so good reasons to break again and again instead of running straigth toward East? 3) Garlin is about 20 km far from to Ludwigslust, not just 10 km. 20 km, especially into that war scene, are a not-so-negligible distance even for planes, for example is the DOUBLE distance from Neustadt-Glewe to Ludwigslust. And is HALF of the distance from Ludwigslust to Perleberg, which is the area covered by the Armed Recce of the four 486 Squadron Tempests. So the correct location identification given by Shaw for Garlin area in his report should have been "at half route from Ludwigslust to Perleberg", not near Ludwigslust, even if Shaw didn't knew the name of Garlin village. So, could it be that Shaw mistook Garlin for Ludwigslust? Of course it could be, but IMHO it's more likely that he didn't. 4) We would also think that witnesses did't recognize British insigna and mistook Tempest for "American planes". Again, it could be possible but Tempests are so different from P-47 or P-51, for colour (camouflaged vs usually silver) even more than for shape and insigna, that German citizen used to look every day at enemy aircraft on their heads, at low heigths, should had little difficulty to recognize correctly. Obviously, it could be that "American" here just means "enemy Allied planes" but this should be verified. All in all, I think that the "Skupina hypothesis" could have no more than 20-30% chance to be right. However, more investigations would be good. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
German overclaims in the East. Hartmann and others... | Nikita Egorov | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 232 | 31st January 2020 04:21 |
NJG loss off Netherlands on 21 January 1942 (and a possible other loss) | Laurent Rizzotti | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 21st January 2016 20:40 |
F-84s vs MiGs | Daniel Nole | Post-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation | 9 | 24th September 2010 21:29 |
Losses of FK I on 29.5.44 | yogybär | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 15 | 22nd January 2009 17:38 |
Loss of Messerschmitt Bf 109G-6 WNr 160619 | Andreas Brekken | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 1 | 24th July 2006 21:26 |