Two Stammkennzeichen

[Nick Beale]

Does anyone know anything about:

1. Aircraft NQ+VR (e.g. type and Werk Nummer; or
2. He 111 SQ+MX (sub-type and Werk Nummer)?

Thanks.

[RT]

SQ+MX He111H-16 161260

NO+V Bf109G-6
ND+V Ju88A-5
NQ+U Ju88C-6/Ju-w34

Nothing for the NQ+V

Rémi

[Nick Beale]

Thanks Rémi,

NQ+AU was a signals aircraft destroyed at Trondheim on 26 or 28 April 1940
NQ+AY was Ju 52, W.Nr. 58634 associated with KGr. 100 in 1940

[Tom Willis]

Hi - I have NQ+VA as a Ju 52/3m - W/Nr 5480. 10./Ln.Rgt.40 dated 29.09.42
The only source I have for this is the Stkz lists from Peter van Gogh

Regards Tom

[Nick Beale]

I also have Ju 87 D-5, W.Nr. 142083, NQ+TC (V8+BD of 3./NSGr. 1).

There seems to be a common thread of Junkers types here.

[Stig Jarlevik]

Nick

Your Ju 52/3m WNr 58634 (KGr 100) in 1940 looks odd. Seems to be one digit too many? Can you confirm?

Cheers
Stig

[RT]

5458 is NQ+AV

NQ+AU was 5480

Rémi

[Nick Beale]

It could refer to the Werk Nummer of the motor — the wording is ambiguous:

CX/JQ/493/17
Restkommando of KGr. 100 Lüneburg, asked on 29/11 [1940] for the records of the middle motor of a/c NQ+AY, W.Nr. 58634.

[RT]

No that is the right Wn of the plane, I hv 3 occurances for the NQ+AY, one time 5860, 2 times 5863, most probably the Wn hv to accepted as 5863

Rémi

Ultra for same plane gives 3 diff. Wn, re-transcription not always at best it seems ..

[Tom Willis]

Hi - I can confirm that NQ+AY with W/Nr 5863 and NQ+AZ with 5864.
But I have the W/Nrs for NQ+AU and NQ+AV the other way around with AU 5458 and AV as 5480. It would appear that NQ+VA is a typo of NQ+AV, hence the same W/Nr.
Regards - Tom