Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 21st September 2006, 23:34
Jack Sanders Jack Sanders is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Hague
Posts: 29
Jack Sanders is on a distinguished road
Re: VVS loss reporting system (Damage/Destroyed/"loss")...

Quote:
Originally Posted by kolya1
Hi,

Could you precise the title of the Khazanov and Gorbach's book, and if possible, what sources did they use, and do they separate combat and non combat casualties (which could explain part of the differences between sources, non-combat also including, if I remember well, worn out aircrafts) ?

The General Staff book was indeed most incomplete (although their (partial) data mostly corresponds to the figures you quote), but Krivosheev is usually a good source, and If you check in it, you have to take into account the Kursk defensive ops but also part of the Orel offensive, in which the losses were more than twice those of the defensive operation...

Honestly, the total figure given for the Kursk, Orel, and Belgorod-Kharkov operations (that is the german offensive and russian counterattacks) between 5/07 and 23/08, 1626 total combat losses seems quite possible, it gives an overclaim ratio of a bit more than 2:1 for the Germans which is not surprising for that time...

Is the total given by Khazanov and Gorbach much higher ?

Thanks,

Kolya.
Hello kolya,
The title of the book is "Aviation in the Battle for the Orel-Kursk Bulge". They use TsAMO documents. They do split causes of losses into combat and non-combat ones, but the combat losses alone are greater than those cited by Krivosheev.
As for Krivosheev, I do not trust a single figure in his book, as I have found and have been made aware by others of numerous inaccuracies in it, always erring on the side of lower Soviet losses.
Khazanov and Gorbach wrote only about the defensive operation, since a second book is to be published covering the offensive operation.
Regardless of what data you use, overall totals are not often conducive to calculating overclaim ratios. I would estimate the German ratio during the battle as 3:1 at best and tending towards 4 or even 5:1. You have to remember that AAA was responsible for a substantial number of losses.

Yours sincerely,

Jack Sanders
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loss of 462SQN RAAF Halifax, 14 July 43 Nick Hector Allied and Soviet Air Forces 4 11th January 2007 10:25
Access to loss reports for VVS (TsAMO) and Luftwaffe kolya1 Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 19th September 2006 17:02
Loss of Messerschmitt Bf 109G-6 WNr 160619 Andreas Brekken Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 1 24th July 2006 21:26
Operation Aphrodite Brian Allied and Soviet Air Forces 25 12th March 2006 19:40
One Loss at Eastern Front Werknummer 10438 Jens Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 14 3rd January 2005 22:09


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2026, 12oclockhigh.net